Engineering, Passenger Rail, Rail Supply, Safety, Standards & Regulation

Andrews unveils $1.6bn Cranbourne-Pakenham project

Grange Road level crossing removal. Graphic: Level Crossing Removal Authority

Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has revealed the winning bidder to remove nine level crossings and rebuild five stations along the Cranbourne-Pakenham rail line in Melbourne’s south east.

A consortium including Lend Lease, CPB Contractors, WSP|Parsons Brinkerhoff, and Aurecon will carry out the work, which includes the construction of several sections of elevated rail lines and upgraded signalling along the corridor, one of Melbourne’s busiest.

Andrews has committed to remove at least 20 of the state’s most dangerous level crossings by 2018, and 50 by 2022.

He said the nine crossings – which together make up every level crossing between Caulfield and Dandenong – are some of Melbourne’s worst, with some boom gates down for more than 87 minutes of the two-hour morning peak.

The project will remove the crossings, and rebuild stations at Carnegie, Murrumbeena, Hughesdale, Clayton and Noble Park.

Thirty station platforms along the line will also be lengthened to cater for the 37 new high-capacity metropolitan trains, which are currently in the process of being tendered, with three competing groups – led by Bombardier, Alstom and Downer EDI – currently on the shortlist.

In addition to the station rebuilds, level crossing removals and platform lengthenings, three sections of newly elevated rail along the line will create 225,000 square metres of community open space, which Andrews says will be reserved for new parks, playgrounds, sporting facilities, car parking and a range of other uses chosen by locals.

“Every single level crossing between Caulfield and Dandenong will become history,” Andrews said. “This tired and ugly rail corridor will become one of Melbourne’s largest community open spaces, with room for parks, playgrounds, netball courts and thousands of new car parks.”

Andrews says expert acoustic modelling shows that raising the line in sections will reduce rail noise at the street level.

He also explained that building new line above the existing line will spare passengers and drivers years of disruption during construction, with the majority of work being completed with trains and roads running normally.

Marcelino Fernández Verdes, chief executive of CPB Contractors’ parent company CIMIC Group, said the company was working to deliver sustainable transport solutions.

“We value the opportunity to contribute our experience to Victoria’s level crossing removals which are improving safety, reducing congestion and creating more connected communities,” he said.

CIMIC Group was until April 2015 known as Leighton Holdings. CPB Contractors is CIMIC Group’s construction subsidiary, and is the combination of Thiess and Leighton Contractors.

CPB Contractors managing director Román Garrido said the company was keen to stay involved in the rail space.

“Rail infrastructure delivery is a core capability for CPB Contractors,” Garrido said. “We are pleased to continue working with LXRA [the Level Crossing Removal Authority] and Metro Trains Melbourne to deliver greater rail network efficiency and a range of community and economic benefits.

“Our Alliance team integrates design, civil, building, track, electrical and signalling specialists experienced in delivering major projects safely within the live rail network.”

With community consultation underway since April, the next phase of consultation will now begin, with the project team set to speak with locals about what the new spaces should be used for.

2 Comments

  1. The bridge illustration shows two tracks onlyl? Is there no planning for quadruplication to separate vline and freight from stopping suburbans? Why not do it all now!

  2. Agreed. Passing Loops at stations are essential on the Cranbourne-Pakenham rail project ,
    e.g. 4 tracks at stations on a dual track line are a major feature of the Japanese High Speed Passenger Rail. e.g. Toykyo – Osaka has a station Mt Fuji with the Express trains passing down the centre with between the other rails that face onto each of the Platforms. The Through (Express) Trains run straight, now squeal of wheels that occurs if the express train is made to go around the local train tracks.
    A mixture of Long haul and All Stops trains are essential for a passenger service that is useful. 60 minutes commuting time is the maximum that people will support.
    In NSW the Katoomba to Sydney trains is local in the Katoomba area and the express until it reache Central.

    The BART in San Fransisco Bay Area
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_Area_Rapid_Transit
    “The maximum speed trains can travel is 130 km/h but BART does not typically operate trains at that speed except to help a train make up time. The maximum speed BART uses during normal operations is 113 kmh”

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/badgerys-creek-airport-on-the-fast-track-highspeed-rail-line-being-considered/news-story/9184ec384daf829e4c532b4065d7c446
    There is a proposal for High Speed train from Sydney CBD to Badgery Creek and Western Suburbs.
    The Chinese High Speed trains have a maximum of 220 km/h to 260 km/h
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Railway_High-speed

    High Speed passenger trains and freight trains would not be compatible because the High Speed Passenger Trains is greater than that for Passenger trains. Passsenger trains would need to slow down to that of the slower user. You would then need Fly Over or Fly Unders for the freight trains to get off the track and get to their intended destination.