Engineering, Environment and Sustainability, Passenger Rail, Research & Development, Rolling stock & Rail Vehicle Design, Safety, Standards & Regulation, Technology and IT

Albanese pitches high speed rail to Canberra

Alstom-built SNCF TGV and Deutsche Bahn-built Intercity-Express (ICE) at Paris Gare de l'Est. Photo: Oliver Probert

Shadow transport minister Anthony Albanese has introduced a bill to the House of Representatives to create a planning authority for a high speed rail line for Australia’s eastern seaboard.

The High Speed Rail Planning Authority Bill 2015, presented to Parliament by the former deputy prime minister on Monday, would create an 11-person authority tasked with beginning detailed planning, and securing the rail corridor needed for a high speed rail link between Brisbane and Melbourne via Sydney and Canberra.

Albanese introduced the same bill to Parliament in 2013, but “the prime minister of the day [Tony Abbott] had no interest in rail and refused to bring the bill on for debate”.

Speaking to Parliament on Monday, Albanese described high speed rail as a “national game changer,” akin to the Snowy Mountains Scheme initiated in 1949 by former Labor prime minister Ben Chifley.

Chifley’s scheme, which created a massive hydroelectricity and irrigation network in southeast Australia, was not completed until 1972. Albanese said high speed rail, like the Snowy Scheme, would not be completed in a single political term.

“Chifley knew that true nation building is not about winning short-term political acclaim, but about taking decisions today that prepare our nation for tomorrow,” Albanese said. “A tomorrow many of us may not have even contemplated.”

The 11-member panel proposed in the bill would include one member from each of the states affected by the proposed line – Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT – along with one member representing local governments, one member nominated by the Australasian Railway Association, and five members appointed by the minister for infrastructure on the basis of qualifications or expertise.

The authority’s roles would include considerations of land use planning relating to the rail corridor, safety, measures to minimise environmental impact, public consultation, and intervention to purchase the corridor.

“High-speed rail exists in every continent other than Australia and Antarctica,” Albanese told his Canberra colleagues.

“New projects are underway all over the world, including in the Asian region, in the UK and in the United States.”

He referred to figures from the two-part high speed rail study he commissioned while he was transport minister under the Labor Government.

With Australia’s population figured to double by 2050, the study predicted travel on the east coast of Australia to grow about 1.8% every year over the next two decades, increasing 60% by 2035. “The study said east coast trips would double from 152 million trips in 2009 to 355 million trips in 2065,” Albanese said.

The 2013 report also found the Melbourne-to-Sydney leg of the high speed rail line would return $2.15 in public benefit, for every dollar invested.

But with a projected price tag of $114 billion, the study made it clear the project would need bipartisan, long-term support to go ahead.

“High-speed rail does require broad support,” Albanese told Canberra.

“Its construction would occur over many terms of government and, indeed, changes of government, which is why it requires broad discussion by this parliament.

“It requires leadership. So let us lead.”

2 Comments

  1. How much of that $114 billion would be available straight away if we abandoned Badgerys Creek airport which would be unnecessary with high speed rail from Melbourne to Brisbane?

  2. In September 2015, the NSW Government stated its intention to proceed with a land release for 100,000 people in the Wilton to Macarthur corridor. This raises the question of whether consideration will
    be given to reserving a corridor for a new High Speed Railway, and/or an
    upgrading of the existing rail line to Medium Speed Rail (MSR) standards.

    The need to address reservation of rail corridors for HSR has been addressed in numerous studies. So the proposed Authority is welcomed.

    Re MSR, in 1991, the Hon W C Wentworth proposed a new line to be
    constructed by leaving the main line south of Menangle to meet the present Main
    South Line just south of Yanderra. The 25 km Wentworth Route would allow
    freight and passenger trains to bypass a 40 km section with excessive tight
    radius curvature, and offer not only appreciable time savings but also fuel
    savings. It was outlined in the 2001 ARTC Track Audit and other papers. Other deviations
    would assist in reducing the current Sydney Canberra train times from over four to
    less than three hours.